Services
ACC representation at every stage of the process.

I can represent you at every stage of the ACC process. Whether you've received an adverse decision or you're about to face a Review Hearing, I can come in and pick your matter up and communicate with ACC on your behalf.

You might need advice on a complex matter that goes back years, or the complexities of a full district court appeal are starting to hit home. I'm here to help.

All services begin with a free initial consultation and to give you an understanding. Contact me first and we will work out what you need.

ACC hearings, reviews, and case conferences are all conducted online. Wherever you are in New Zealand, this is not a barrier.

A woman at a kitchen table reading ACC paperwork with a tired, thoughtful expression.
A man in his late forties standing at a window in a New Zealand home, looking outside.

Review Hearings — Challenging an ACC Decision

If ACC has made a decision you disagree with, you have three months to apply for a review. I can assist by preparing the submissions, procuring specialist opinions and evidence, and representing you at the hearing. This is where many cases are resolved without going to court. ACC funds most review legal costs — including specialist medical reports — whether the review is successful or not.

Reviews cover all types of ACC decisions, including declined cover, suspended weekly compensation, treatment disputes, and vocational assessments. A well-prepared review can resolve matters without the need for a court appeal. The review is heard by an independent reviewer, not an ACC employee. Both sides present evidence and submissions.

  • Representation at the review hearing
  • Written submissions on law and evidence
  • Liaison with ACC before and during the process
  • Advice on strategy throughout

File Review and Advice — Understanding Your Position

Before any review or appeal is prepared, the file needs to be understood. I will review your ACC records and correspondence and give you a clear picture of your position and your options.

This is often the most important step. It determines the strategy: what arguments are available, what evidence is missing, and whether a review or appeal is the right path. File reviews are particularly useful if you have received an unfavourable decision and are not sure what went wrong, or if you have been through a review without legal representation and want to understand what happened.

ACC Appeals — District Court Representation

If a review decision goes against you, you have 28 days to appeal to the District Court. I have extensive experience at this level. The preparation, particularly on evidence and legal argument, needs to be thorough.

District Court appeals are heard de novo — the facts and medical evidence are heard again, not simply legal argument about whether the reviewer applied the law correctly. They are more formal than reviews. If your appeal succeeds, ACC will generally pay your legal costs. If the appeal is unsuccessful, you may bear your own costs, though legal aid is available regardless of outcome. A careful assessment of prospects at the outset matters for exactly this reason — though legal aid might be available regardless of outcome.

High Court Appeals — Points of Law Only

In some cases, a District Court decision can be appealed to the High Court, but only on a question of law. These are relatively uncommon and require a strong legal basis. I have appeared at High Court level in ACC matters.

High Court ACC appeals are reserved for cases where there is a genuine and arguable point of law. The threshold is higher than a District Court appeal. If you are considering this step, I will give you a frank assessment of whether the legal question you have is one that meets that threshold.

Weekly Compensation Disputes and Backdating

Weekly compensation disputes are among the most financially critical ACC matters. I have handled a significant number of these cases, including backdated claims going back many years and cases where ACC has suspended payments without adequate basis. One of the key disputes involving weekly compensation claims is whether the covered injury caused incapacity to work.

Weekly compensation is the income replacement paid to claimants who cannot work because of their injury. Disputes arise about when entitlements began, whether they were correctly calculated, and whether ACC had grounds to reduce or suspend them. Backdated claims can involve substantial arrears.

  • Backdated weekly compensation claims
  • Reinstatement of suspended entitlements
  • Historical claims and arrears
  • Loss of potential earnings disputes

Cover and Causation in ACC Claims

Cover is the foundation of everything. Without it, no entitlements are available. Cover disputes almost always turn on medical evidence, and I work at the intersection of legal argument and medical opinion to build the strongest possible case for cover.

Cover depends on whether your injury arose from an accident, a work-related gradual process, treatment injury, or in some cases a criminal act. The definition of accident is broader than most people think, but ACC does not always get the assessment right. Was this injury caused in the way the claimant says? Is a later condition a consequence of the original injury? These are legal and medical questions that require careful analysis and the right specialist evidence.

Medical Evidence and Independent Specialist Reports

Medical evidence is often the difference between a successful matter and an unsuccessful one. Briefing independent specialists is something I do as a service in itself — not just a step in casework. I work with specialists across relevant disciplines, briefing them carefully on the specific questions that matter to the legal argument.

A well-briefed specialist report does more than confirm an injury. It engages with the causation questions, responds to ACC's own medical positions, and gives a reviewer or judge the evidence they need to decide in your favour. I do not simply ask for a report. I identify the questions that need to be answered and make sure they are addressed directly.

  • Identification of appropriate independent specialists
  • Preparation of detailed briefs and questions for specialists
  • Analysis of ACC's medical reports and preparation of responses
  • Coordination of evidence across multiple specialists where needed

Negotiated Resolution with ACC

Not every ACC dispute needs to go to a hearing. In many cases, particularly on complex or long-standing matters, I can work directly with ACC to negotiate a resolution that serves my client's interests without the cost and delay of formal proceedings.

ACC has increasingly moved toward settlement and negotiated resolution, particularly for complex, historical, or long-standing cases. In some situations, a direct approach achieves a better outcome for the client than a contested hearing. This requires understanding how ACC operates internally, having established professional relationships with ACC managers and case specialists, and knowing when a negotiated outcome is genuinely in the client's interest. I have those relationships and that understanding. My clients' interests always come first, but achieving a fair result quickly and without unnecessary stress is always the preferred outcome where it is possible.

Historical and Complex ACC Claims (including CRPS)

Some ACC matters go back years or even decades. Long-standing claims, particularly those involving delayed onset conditions or historic compensation arrears, require patient and careful work. I have experience with these cases, including complex regional pain syndrome.

Historical claims often require locating old records, working with transitional provisions in the legislation, and building evidence around circumstances that are difficult to reconstruct. Complex regional pain syndrome is a condition ACC has historically been reluctant to accept, but which is increasingly recognised in the case law. These cases require persistence and specialist medical support.

Sensitive Claims

Confidential support for ACC sensitive claims. I understand the process, the sensitivity, and how to navigate ACC's specific pathways for these matters.

Sensitive claims relate to historical, physical and mental injuries relating to sexual violence or abuse. They have their own pathway within the ACC system.

I can help with:

Legal aid is available for most sensitive claim matters. Everything is confidential. The first call is free.

  • Lodging sensitive claims
  • Reviewing entitlements, including backdated weekly compensation
  • Reviewing declined sensitive claims
  • Loss of Potential Earnings (LOPE) claims arising from sensitive claim cover
  • Working with ACC's sensitive claims unit

POSSE Claims — ACC Service Failure Compensation

A POSSE payment is a discretionary compensation made by ACC where there has been a serious service failure causing real harm. These claims are not widely known, but they can result in meaningful compensation for clients who have been genuinely let down.

POSSE stands for Payment Outside of Statutory Entitlements. To succeed, a claim requires a provable and serious ACC service failure, and demonstrable loss, both financial and otherwise. I have experience with these claims and can advise whether your circumstances might support one.

Legal Aid

If you cannot fund legal representation, you may be eligible for legal aid. I am a Lead Provider of Legal Aid in ACC matters and can accept legal aid cases and manage the application on your behalf. Eligibility is based on household income, assets, and the nature of your matter. Legal aid does not affect the quality of the work.

Free initial consultation

Not sure which service applies to your situation?

Tell me about your matter and I will work out what you need. The first conversation is free.